Korea Market Heat

As of 2026-08-03

Forced selling at the last close

Through 2026-08-03, forced liquidation dominated the tape.

Scored on closing data through 2026-08-03. Each indicator carries its own date below.

Score = the mean of all 8 indicators: stable 1.0, neutral 0.5, red 0. It measures how much of the panel is under strain; the headline above says which way leverage is moving.

Two different lags: prices, FX and investor flows move through the Korean session and stay provisional until the 15:30 KST close, while leverage figures publish a day after it. Each card shows its own date.

19/100
Severely strained
1 stable · 1 neutral · 6 red
Margin balanceForced liquidationLeveraged ETF turnoverCredit/cash ratioForeign flowUSD/KRWJapan betaTaiwan beta

Domestic leverage stress

Margin balance

Retail investors are holding ₩28.9T of stock bought with money borrowed from brokers.

↓ Lower is better As of 2026-07-31 · behind last close

What it measures. Won that retail investors have borrowed from brokers to buy stock. When it stops rising and starts falling, the leverage build-up is being worked off.

Formula. The margin balance itself, in ₩T. Reported in millions of won; converted ×1e-6.

Reference levels. Pre-hype normal is ₩16–20T (calm median 19.0, 90th percentile 23.7). Stable at or below ₩20T, neutral to ₩25.6T — the 2021 mania peak — red above it.

Caveat. A level says how much leverage is outstanding, not whether it is unwinding voluntarily. Read it beside forced liquidation: the same balance falling while that indicator is red means brokers are selling collateral.

Forced liquidation

7.1% of margin positions were force-sold that day because investors could not meet their margin calls.

↓ Lower is better As of 2026-07-31 · behind last close

What it measures. The share of overdue margin positions that brokers auto-sold that day. Spikes mark a margin-call cascade.

Formula. Today's ratio, with no averaging. Stable below 1.1, neutral below 3.0, red at or above 3.0.

Reference levels. Calibrated on the daily readings since 2024: calm median 0.7, 85th percentile about 1.0–1.1, 95th about 3.1.

Caveat. The definition changed in late 2023 — uncollected receivables bloated the denominator and stepped the ratio down 5–10×. This series therefore starts in 2024, and earlier values are not comparable.

Leveraged ETF turnover

₩2.64T changed hands that day in 2× leveraged ETFs — leverage bought through the exchange rather than on broker credit.

↓ Lower is better Data as of 2026-08-03

What it measures. How much money is actually moving through 2× long funds. The margin balance only sees credit extended by brokers; this is the leverage retail buys through the exchange, and it moves first.

Formula. Daily ₩ traded in KODEX Leverage (KOSPI 200 2×) plus KODEX KOSDAQ150 Leverage — closing price × share volume, summed.

Reference levels. Stable below ₩1.0T a day, neutral to ₩2.0T, red above. Calm years sit remarkably flat: 2021–2025 medians all fall between ₩0.44T and ₩0.69T.

Caveat. Turnover is churn, not holdings — the same won can trade many times a day, so it measures activity rather than the size of the pool. Inverse and 2× short funds are excluded: they are leveraged bets too, but bearish ones, and including them would make the number rise on both fear and greed.

Credit/cash ratio

Margin debt is 27.8% of the cash sitting in broker accounts.

↓ Lower is better As of 2026-07-31 · behind last close

What it measures. Margin debt measured against the cash sitting in broker accounts — how stretched leverage is, rather than how large it is.

Formula. Margin balance divided by customer deposits held at brokers, as a percentage.

Reference levels. Stable below 35%, neutral to 38.1%, red above. Korean desks call 35% burdensome and 40% the top; 35% is also the 63rd percentile of the stored record.

Caveat. Both sides scale with the market, so unlike the margin balance this does not drift as the index grows. It is an aggregate: if deposits swell with idle new accounts while debt concentrates among active traders, the ratio understates the risk — which is why the absolute balance is kept beside it.

Foreign flow

Foreign flow

Foreign investors’ net flow that day was -₩2.82T.

↑ Higher is better Data as of 2026-08-03

What it measures. Net buying or selling by foreign investors — the flow that has driven the drawdown. A turn needs their selling to slow sharply or flip.

Formula. Net buying minus selling by foreign investors that day, in ₩T, as reported.

Reference levels. Stable when foreigners bought that day. Red below −₩1.8T, about the 1st percentile of calm-era days.

Caveat. A raw won figure, so it grows with the market: ₩1T of selling is less pressure at a KOSPI of 6,600 than at 2,500. It is shown unadjusted anyway, because a deflated number matches nothing any Korean source publishes and cannot be checked.

USD/KRW

One US dollar buys 1429 won. A weaker won is the capital-flight tell.

↓ Lower is better Data as of 2026-08-03

What it measures. The capital-flight tell. A genuine foreign exodus weakens the won quickly.

Formula. The USD/KRW rate itself.

Reference levels. Stable at or below 1,313 (the calm-era median), neutral to 1,429.5 (the 90th percentile), red above. A weaker won is the capital-flight tell, so higher is worse.

Caveat. The won also moves on rate differentials and dollar strength that have nothing to do with Korean equities.

External control

Japan beta

Korea moved 3.61× as far as Japan over the last 5 sessions.

↓ Lower is better Data as of 2026-08-03

What it measures. Whether a regional move is arriving in Korea amplified — the signature of leverage still in the system — or one-for-one.

Formula. Beta of KOSPI to the Nikkei over the last 5 sessions: cov(KOSPI, Nikkei) ÷ var(Nikkei) on daily returns.

Reference levels. Stable below 1.2, neutral to 1.8, red above. Beta near 1 means Korea moves with the region; 2 means a regional wobble arrives in Seoul at double size, which is what leverage does.

Caveat. Beta measures amplitude, not direction: Korea falling alone while Japan is flat produces a LOW beta and reads stable. A 5-session window is deliberately responsive and therefore noisy — read it as a current estimate, not a trend.

Taiwan beta

Korea moved 2.13× as far as Taiwan over the last 5 sessions.

↓ Lower is better Data as of 2026-08-03

What it measures. The closest regional comparator. Korea and Taiwan are both semiconductor-heavy export economies, so Korea amplifying Taiwan means Korean leverage rather than a regional tech de-rating.

Formula. Beta of KOSPI to the TAIEX over the last 5 sessions: cov(KOSPI, TAIEX) ÷ var(TAIEX) on daily returns.

Reference levels. Stable below 1.2, neutral to 1.8, red above. Taiwan isolates the semiconductor cycle; Japan reads broader regional risk appetite.

Caveat. Same limits as the Japan beta: it reads amplitude rather than direction, and 5 sessions is a small sample. Taiwan also carries cross-strait and TSMC-specific risks unrelated to Korea.

Data may be delayed, and each metric is dated independently: leverage figures publish one day after the close, while price, FX and investor-flow data arrive the same day. The date on each card shows when that metric was last updated.

© 2026 dipping.ai · Not financial advice. Content may not be fully accurate. · Terms